 |
 |
 |
|
|
An Iranian protestor throws a stone at the Austrian Embassy, the country which currently holds the presidency of the European Union, in a protest over drawings of the Prophet Muhammed in European newspapers, as police officers look on, in Tehran, Iran, Monday. (AP)
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
 |
A member of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron, or TIPH, reacts as observers are forced to leave their offices in Hebron, Wednesday. (AP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| By Associated Press February 9, 2006 |
|
| |
 |
| Iranian protesters burn Danish and French flags in front of the Austrian Embassy, Monday. (AP) |
| |
The Danish editor behind the publication of caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad that ignited deadly riots in the Muslim world said Wednesday he's trying to coordinate with an Iranian paper soliciting cartoons on the Holocaust.
"My newspaper is trying to establish a contact with the Iranian newspaper, and we would run the cartoons the same day as they publish them," Flemming Rose said Wednesday in an interview on CNN's "American Morning."
The Iranian newspaper Hamshahri said Tuesday it would hold the competition to test whether the West extends the principle of freedom of expression to the Nazi genocide as it did to the caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad.
Those cartoons were first published by Rose's newspaper Jyllands-Posten in September. As Muslim protests mounted, numerous European newspapers have reprinted them in recent days in the name of free expression, provoking wider and angrier protests.
Rose, Jyllands-Posten's culture editor, told CNN he came up with the idea after several local cases of self-censorship involving people fearing reprisals from Muslims.
"There was a story out there and we had to cover it," Rose said. "We just chose to cover it in a different way, according to the principal: Don't tell it, show it."
The drawings - including one depicting the prophet wearing a turban shaped as a bomb - have touched a nerve in part because Islam is interpreted to forbid any illustrations of the Prophet Muhammad for fear they could lead to idolatry.
"I do not regret it," Rose said. "I think it is like asking a rape victim if she regrets wearing a short skirt at a discotheque Friday night. In that sense, in our culture, if you're wearing a short skirt, that does not necessarily mean you invite everybody to have sex with you. As is the case with these cartoons, if you make a cartoon, make fun of religion, make fun of religious figures, that does not imply that you humiliate or denigrate or marginalize a religion."
The Iranian newspaper said its contest would be launched Monday and co-sponsored by the House of Caricatures, a Tehran exhibition center for cartoons. The paper and the cartoon center are owned by the Tehran Municipality, which is dominated by allies of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, well-known for his opposition to Israel.
As violence continues, some wonder if extremist groups fanning anger over cartoons
The foreign minister of one Muslim country, Indonesia, says radical groups are exploiting genuine public anger over the Prophet cartoons for their own ends. A U.S. military spokesman says extremist groups may be inciting the protests.
As anger and controversy over the caricatures continues, there are growing questions whether countries like Syria and extremist groups like the Taliban are fanning the outrage.
Few doubt there is genuine anger throughout the Muslim world. For religious and secular Muslims alike, the images of the revered Prophet Mohammed with a bomb strapped to his head are crude, racist and deeply insulting.
"It was a message that all his (Mohammed's) followers are terrorists," said Diaa Rashwan, an expert on Islamic and militant groups. In a world after the Sept. 11 attacks, when Muslims already feel they bear the brunt of the war on terror, the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and new pressure on Iran and Syria, Muslims feel more threatened than ever, Rashwan said Wednesday.
"That only further fueled the anger this time around," he said. In essence, the cartoons may have simply pushed an already edgy Muslim world into a frenzy, releasing bottled-up anger and frustration.
Others think the violent crowds in some countries had encouragement.
In Afghanistan, where two days of riots left more than 10 dead, U.S. military spokesman Col. James Yonts said the United States and other countries are examining whether extremist groups incited riots.
"Other countries are having the same demonstrations, same problems - very violent demonstrations, starting peaceful, turning violent," Yonts said when asked if al-Qaida and the Taliban may have been involved.
He said the U.S. and other countries would look to see "if this is something larger than just a small demonstration - if there is a tie to it, if there is an infrastructure, a connection to it."
Zahor Afghan, the editor of Erada, Afghanistan's most respected newspaper, said he felt there was definite incitement.
"No media in Afghanistan has published or broadcast pictures of these cartoons. The radio has been reporting on it, but there are definitely people using this to incite violence against the presence of foreigners in Afghanistan," he said.
In Indonesia, that country's foreign minister said he also believed radical groups around the world had jumped on the issue.
"The cartoons have hurt the Islamic community, so it has added to ammunition for (global) radical groups to exploit the situation," Hassan Wirajuda said.
In Lebanon, protests against the Danish embassy turned into the stoning of a nearby Christian church. Anti-Syrian groups have accused Damascus of sending in violent rioters to destabilize the country and re-ignite a Lebanese civil war.
Analysts say Syria - under intense pressure over the slaying of Lebanese leader Rafik Hariri and U.S. accusations of harboring terrorists - is sending a message that it can, and will, cause trouble if pushed too hard.
"They're (Syria) basically telling the West that we have a lot of potential for rage and anger and here is a sample of it, so stay away from us," said prominent Egyptian-American democracy advocate Saadiddine Ibrahim.
As in Syria, several hundred protesters burned and ransacked the Danish and Austrian embassies in Iran's capital, Tehran. In a country where the government has absolute control, few believe the protesters could have pulled off such a brazen act without tacit government consent.
"It's clear these reactions were supported by some political elements. Even state media alluded to the fact that European governments intentionally ordered the production of cartoons," said Iranian political sociologist Hamid Reza Jalaipour.
He thinks the violent protests were payback for the U.N. nuclear watchdog referring Iran to the U.N. Security Council over its nuclear program.
The cartoons were first published on Sept. 30 in a Danish Daily, The Jyllands-Posten. Several days later, a coalition of Muslims in Denmark demanded a meeting with the country's Culture Ministry to protest the drawings, but the ministry refused.
The Muslim coalition turned to foreign embassies, and then went on a tour of the Muslim and Arab world, calling attention to the cartoons. On a tour of several Mideast countries between December and January, the group showed the drawings that had been published by The Jyllands-Posten, but they also compiled a document showing other cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, some even more offensive than those the newspaper had published.
The tour prompted governments in the Mideast, including Saudi Arabia, to order boycotts of Danish goods. Soon after, newspapers around the world began republishing the drawings and the issue was brought back into the spotlight.
Newspapers have argued that publishing the cartoons is a matter of free speech, but many Muslims find that argument hard to believe. One 40-year-old Afghani farmer, Sher Mohammed, said Americans and Europeans "are trying to impose their culture on us by abusing our religion."
Even further angering Muslims is what they view as an apparent double standard the West holds on free speech. In 2004, France's media watchdog, the CSA, forced a Lebanese TV network to pull a program off the airwaves because Jewish groups had complained it was anti-Semitic.
Repeated calls for restraint from all sides, including the European parliament and Arab and Muslim governments, have so far fallen on deaf ears.
"There are people on both sides that want to ignite this flame," said Reshwan.
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the  icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.
|
|
| |
|
|
