Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
United Nations

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
    Subscribe    
         









Gillerman: Security Council "put the victim of terrorism in the dock and not the perpetrators."
Views: Tsunami rescues UN
Views: The UN's PR coup
Annan aide: Ariel Sharon is "like an assassin."
UNRWA chief accuses Israel of inciting hatred against his work
Israeli resolution set to test United Nations bias
Media roundup: Durban conference lived down to expectations
U.S. and Israel walk out of "hijacked" Durban Conference
Norwegian wording may prevent Israeli, American walkout from Durban
Durban conference on racism opens with anti-Israel focus

 
American veto stops unbalanced UN Security Council resolution
By Associated Press  October 6, 2004
 
UNITED NATIONS - The United States on Tuesday vetoed an Arab-backed resolution demanding an immediate end to military operations in the northern Gaza Strip and the withdrawal of Israeli forces.

The vote in the 15-member Security Council was 11 in favor and one against, with Britain, Germany and Romania abstaining.

U.S. Ambassador John Danforth cast the U.S. veto after British and German efforts to find compromise language failed.

"Once again, the resolution is lopsided and unbalanced," Danforth told the council just before voting "no."

"It is dangerously disingenuous because of its many material omissions. Because of this lack of balance, because of these omissions, the resolution lacks credibility and deserves a `no' vote," he said.

After the vote, Algeria's U.N. Ambassador Abdallah Baali, the only Arab member of the council, thanked the resolution's supporters and noted that the measure got more than the minimum nine "yes" votes needed for adoption.

Citing the high casualty toll and extensive destruction during the Israeli offensive, he said, "It is a sad day for the Palestinians and it is a sad day for justice."

Arab nations that introduced the resolution on Monday said they wanted a quick vote because of the urgency of the Israeli military operation -- the deadliest Israeli incursion into Gaza in more than four years of fighting.

The resolution would have condemned "the broad military incursion and attacks by the Israeli occupying forces in the area of northern Gaza Strip, including in and around the Jabaliya refugee camp, resulting in extensive human casualties and destruction and exacerbating the dire humanitarian situation."

The defeated draft demanded "the immediate cessation of all military operations in the area of northern Gaza and the withdrawal of the Israeli occupying forces from that area."

It called for a cessation of violence, adherence to international humanitarian law, and for Israel and the Palestinians to immediately implement the long-stalled "road map" to peace backed by the United Nations, the United States, the European Union and Russia.

Danforth said the resolution put the blame on Israel "and absolves terrorists in the Middle East -- people who shoot rockets into civilian areas, people who are responsible for killing children."

The United States in the past has vetoed similar resolutions, saying they lacked balance by not criticizing Palestinian attacks against Israelis while concentrating only on Israeli responses.

Nasser al-Kidwa, the Palestinians' representative, scoffed at Israel's assertion that the military operation was a justified response to the firing of two Palestinian rockets from Gaza that killed two children in the southern Israeli city of Sderot on Wednesday.

Al-Kidwa told the council on Monday that Israeli reacted to an attack by a "rudimentary" rocket by sending 2,000 troops, 100 tanks, more than 100 other armored vehicles and bulldozers and helicopter gunships into the strip, focusing on the Jebaliya refugee camp.

"Now there are hundreds of Palestinians without shelter as a result of that total demolition or partial demolition of their homes, tens of thousands without water or electricity and suffering from severe shortages of food and medicine, precipitating a genuine humanitarian tragedy," Al-Kidwa said.

Israeli Ambassador Dan Gillerman said the Palestinian rocket attacks had become more sophisticated and created "an insufferable situation that no country ... would tolerate."

The council once again, he said, "had put the victim of terrorism in the dock and not the perpetrators."


 Talk Back! Respond to this article



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |