
 |
 |
 |
 |

 |
Security barrier (AP file)
|
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
| By Associated Press May 19, 2006 |
|
| |
As America contemplates construction of a massive fence along the Mexican border, it can look to Israel as a valuable test case.
Israel is largely achieving its goal of keeping out Palestinian suicide bombers through a sprawling complex of fences, electric sensors and concrete slabs that snake in and out of the West Bank. But building the barrier has been a gutwrenching process, fraught with political and diplomatic hurdles, that has worsened Israel's relations with its neighbors.
To be sure, there are key differences between the cases. Most important, the Israeli structure frequently juts into occupied territory claimed by the Palestinians. The American fence would run along a recognized border.
Yet Mexican reaction to the American plan sounded conspicuously similar to long-standing Palestinian complaints that the solution is cruel, humiliating and fails to address deeper problems straining relations.
"I don't think there is any parallel here because the U.S. does not occupy Mexican territory," said Palestinian lawmaker Saeb Erekat, who has led past peace negotiations. "That said, concrete walls and fences will not make good neighbors. Trust, mutual cooperation and understanding are the fences that make good neighbors."
Israel began construction of the barrier in 2002, at the height of a terrifying wave of suicide bombings. The Defense Ministry says about half of the 760 kilometer (470-mile) structure has been built, and it expects to complete work in 2008, depending on the results of ongoing court challenges.
Almost all of the barrier consists of 3-meter (10-foot) electronically monitored fences sandwiched between patrol roads, razor wire and ditches. The remainder, about 5 percent, is made of huge concrete slabs roughly 8 meters (25 feet) tall. The barrier is dotted with watchtowers and checkpoints where people are allowed to pass.
U.S. President George W. Bush envisions a comparable structure involving motion sensors, infrared cameras and unmanned drones flying above.
The White House said Thursday that Bush supports a 590-kilometer (370-mile) barrier to seal off popular crossing points, though lawmakers have approved a bill allowing 1,100 kilometers (700 miles) of fencing, slightly longer than the Israeli version.
U.S. and Israeli officials said they were unaware of any plans for Israel to offer advice or bid for contracts in construction of the American fence, though that could change.
Throughout history, fences have provided a simple solution for dividing people. The Berlin Wall was perhaps the most famous example, before it was taken down in 1989. Cyprus and Belfast are among other modern-day hotspots where populations have been divided.
The Israeli version has been quite effective as a security measure. Since construction began, the number of suicide bombings in the country has dropped significantly, from 41 in 2002 to five last year, according to AP figures.
Although other factors have been at work, including an informal cease-fire by Palestinian militants in 2005, Israeli officials say the barrier has been the key to maintaining calm.
"This is a direct result of the security fence," said national police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld. "It's very very difficult for people to come and go as they please."
That quiet, however, has come with a price.
Jutting into the West Bank, it has caused severe hardship for Palestinians, who accuse Israel of carrying out a massive land grab. Many Palestinians have been cut off from farms, hindered from traveling, and blocked from reaching jobs, hospitals and other services inside Israel. Palestinians refer to the barrier as the "apartheid wall."
The barrier also has drawn widespread international condemnation. In a 2004 advisory ruling, the World Court declared the barrier illegal and urged Israel to tear it down. Israeli court challenges have also forced officials to change the route.
For years, Israel claimed the barrier was strictly a temporary security measure. But Israel's new prime minister, Ehud Olmert, now says the barrier, which is expected to swallow roughly 7-9 percent of the West Bank, will be the basis for Israel's final border. That plan has received a cool reception abroad.
Even if the barrier is completed, there is no guarantee that the border will be airtight. Israeli security officials say militant groups are constantly searching for ways to sneak into the country. Thousands of laborers continue to enter in areas where construction is not complete, or by traveling in cars with Israeli license plates.
"There is always a possibility that they can hide in a vehicle. It's the army's job to make sure they don't do this," said Danny Rothschild, head of the Council for Peace and Security, an advisory body of 1,200 former military officers.
Such attempts are only likely to increase as the situation in the Palestinian territories -- which has been hit hard by an economic boycott against the Hamas-led government -- becomes more desperate, said Mohammed Ishtayeh, head of the Palestinian Economic Council for Development and Reconstruction.
"They aren't willing to suffer, so they will take risks," he said.
Mexicans offered similar reactions to Wednesday's decision by the U.S. Senate to back a border fence, which already has been endorsed by the House. Migrant workers desperate for work said that they would simply find new ways to enter the U.S.
Israeli analyst Yossi Alpher said a fence cannot resolve deep economic and political conflicts. "But without a fence these issues are going to be exacerbated," he said.
|
|
 

 
|
|
|
|
Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.
|
|
| |
|
|