|
|
| By Associated Press January 3, 2007 |
|
| |
 Bookmark to del.icio.us |
| |
Iran will possess nuclear weapons unless military action is taken against it, and Israel would be capable of carrying out such an attack, a respected Israeli think tank said Tuesday.
"Time is working in Iran's favor, and barring military action, Iran's possession of nuclear weapons is only a matter of time," Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Security Studies said in a statement distributed at a news conference where it released its annual assessment of the Middle East's strategic balance.
Israel considers Iran to be its most serious threat. It dismisses Tehran's claims that its nuclear program is designed solely to produce energy and is worried by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's repeated calls to wipe the Jewish state off the map.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has not ruled out a military strike against Iran's nuclear program, but has said he hoped other ways could be found to keep Tehran from becoming a nuclear power. In 1981, Israel destroyed an unfinished Iraqi nuclear reactor in a surprise air attack.
The INSS think tank stopped short of calling for an Israeli military strike to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions.
Although experts elsewhere have questioned Israel's ability to cripple the Iranian program, which is scattered and built in part in underground bunkers, analysts at INSS said Israel would be capable of carrying it off.
Giora Eiland, a former Israeli national security adviser and a retired general, said there would not be a military strike without a full "strategic and military" understanding with the U.S.
"Even if, at the end of the day, Israeli jets are going to carry out, or execute, this attack, it might be perceived -- and rightly -- as an understanding between the United States and Israel," Eiland said.
INSS head Zvi Shtauber, a retired general who also served as Israel's ambassador in London and senior policy adviser to former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, said Israel was "technically" capable of striking alone and would have to do so if it takes action, because no other country would agree to work openly with Israel.
Taking issue with Eiland's assessment that the U.S. must sign off on such an attack, he said, "There are certain things that it's better the U.S. not know about."
Institute analysts, while doubtful that international sanctions would sway Iran from its nuclear ambitions, said the time had not yet come to decide on military action.
"We should do it only when it's clear we've exhausted all other means," Shtauber said.
The institute also assessed that threats to Middle East security and stability worsened in 2006 as a result of no progress toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the absence of significant achievements in the war against global terror and Islamic extremism and the failure of U.S. efforts to stabilize Iraq. |
|
 
|
|
|
|
Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the  icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.
|
|
| |
|
|
