Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home | security | politics | diplomacy | anti-semitism | culture | travel | views | Shmooze! | today's weblog  
 
Diplomacy > Iran

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         












Neal Sher , a New York attorney, previously served as the Director of the Justice Department's Office of Special Investigations and is the former Executive Director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Views: An open letter of apology to Jews from Iran's exiled opposition
Hitler was a Jew and a Zionist, Ahmadinejad's aide claims
Views: Indict Ahmadinejad
Views: Iranians Are Friends of the Jews
Embarrassment for Ahmadinejad in elections
Chief Rabbi calls for boycott of Jewish sect that sucked up to Persian Pervert
Ahmadinejad caught on video in serious breach of sharia law
Israel, Iran meet secretly to exchange funds
Iran asks Arabs to join anti-U.S. military alliance

 
Put Ahmadinejad where he belongs: On the Watchlist
By Neal Sher   January 3, 2007


 Bookmark to del.icio.us

On April 27, 1987, as Director of the Office of Special Investigations ("OSI") in the Justice Department, I notified the INS that Austrian President Kurt Waldheim was to be placed on the "Watchlist" of persons barred from entering the United States. The Secretary of State and Attorney General had concluded, after an investigation and report by OSI, that Waldheim's participation in the persecution of civilian populations while serving as an officer in the Army of Nazi Germany, left them no choice.

It mattered not that he was the leader of a friendly country or that a firestorm of diplomatic protests would ensue; the law was the law. Thus, a loud and clear message was sent from Washington that the United States truly is a nation of laws, above which stands no man.

The time is now for the Bush Administration to reiterate that worthy principle and place another head of state -- President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad -- on the same "Watchlist" of criminals, Nazis and other unsavory characters. The grounds are clear, as our immigration law unambiguously excludes any person who has engaged in or incited terrorist activity, or who "has used his position of prominence to endorse or espouse terrorist activity in a way that undermines United States efforts to reduce or eliminate terrorist activities."

The evidence against Ahmadenijad is overwhelming and irrefutable, precluding any serious argument that he is not covered by these prohibitions. The public record is replete with his repeated threats for Israel to be "wiped off the map" and his calls for the inevitable "disappearance" of the American and British infidels. All this, as he rushes to develop nuclear weapons while providing extensive weaponry, training and funding to Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah, each of which officially has been designated a terrorist organization by our government.

Indeed, in March of this year, Secretary Rice effectively made the case for barring Ahmadinejad as she aptly described his Iran as a "central banker for terrorism in important regions like Lebanon through Hezbollah, in the Palestinian Territories", noting her "deep concerns about what Iran is doing in the south of Iraq." A month later the Secretary's conclusions were reinforced in the Report of the State Department's Office of Coordinator for Counterterrorism which found that under Ahmadinejad "Iran remained the most active state sponsor of terrorism... and [was] directly involved in the planning and support of terrorist acts and continued to exhort a variety of groups, especially Palestinian groups... and Lebanese Hezbollah, to use terrorism in pursuit of their goals... In addition, [Iran] was increasingly involved in supplying lethal assistance to Iraqi militant groups which destabilizes Iraq..."

Last month, prominent human rights lawyers, scholars and activists convened in New York to present a powerful case that Ahmadenijad should be indicted under Article 3 of the Convention to Prevent and Punish the Crime of Genocide, which makes punishable the "direct and public incitement to commit genocide." Noting recent examples of inaction and delayed responses in confronting genocide, the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs released a manuscript which convincingly sets forth the bases for handing up such charges in the hope that "if the world wakes up and enforces its law, the future of genocide will read quite differently, and perhaps not at all."

In the 1930's Hitler left no doubt about his genocidal intentions. The U.S. and the free world reacted with deafening silence while some embraced appeasement. In the end, entire Jewish communities and a staggering portion of European Jewry were, as the Iranian president would put it, "wiped off the map."

If history has taught us anything, it is that menacing threats of mass murder must be taken seriously. Silence, in the face of Ahamdinejad's threats, accompanying terrorist crimes and feverish push to obtain nuclear arms, is unacceptable. For starters, and at a very minimum, the Administration should follow the Waldheim precedent by putting him where he belongs: among the rogues gallery of criminals and undesirables who cannot set foot on our soil.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |