By Michael Freund
December 20, 2002
Originally published in the Jerusalem Post.
It is a cruel and ruthless military occupation, one which has persisted for decades and been declared illegal by international organizations. Hundreds of thousands of Arabs have been turned into refugees, as settlers sent by the occupying power slowly but steadily alter the tenuous demographic balance.
Human rights abuses are rampant, and although the government signed a peace treaty years ago, intended to grant the residents a voice in determining their own future, it has done everything in its power to prevent the deal from being realized.
Welcome to Western Sahara, a large strip of land subjugated by Morocco along northern Africa's Atlantic coastline.
If you have not heard of the area, or of its myriad problems, that is probably because it receives little if any coverage in the Western press. Apparently, the world is too busy berating Israel for defending itself against the Palestinians to take much notice, particularly since it is an Arab state (i.e. Morocco) that is doing the "occupying."
Cases such as Western Sahara provide the most compelling proof of the international community's double standard regarding Israel and various other global conflicts. For all the attention that is devoted to every IDF roadblock that is set up, every curfew that is enforced, and every Palestinian terrorist's home that is demolished, virtually nothing is said nor heard when it comes to other land disputes, such as Morocco's brutal occupation of its neighbor.
In 1975, after the Spanish colonial regime in Western Sahara was withdrawn, the region's populace, known as the Sahrawis, looked forward to finally obtaining their long sought-after independence. Their hopes, however, were quickly dashed, when the Moroccan army invaded, seizing control and claiming the area as its own.
In October 1975, the International Court of Justice ruled that Morocco's claim to the area was illegitimate, issuing an advisory opinion stating there was insufficient evidence to support "any tie of territorial sovereignty" between Western Sahara and Morocco. The Organization of African Unity, as well as some 75 nations worldwide, rejected Morocco's position, and recognized the Sahrawi government-in-exile as the area's legitimate ruler.
But that has not stopped the Moroccans from pursuing their expansionist aims. Since the very beginning of their occupation, they have been pouring money, resources and settlers in to the area, in a brazen attempt to "Morrocanize" Western Sahara and undermine any chance of it achieving freedom.
In 1980, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution recognizing "the inalienable right of the people of Western Sahara to self-determination and independence," and expressed "deep concern at the aggravation of the situation prevailing in Western Sahara because of the continued occupation of that Territory by Morocco."
Though a 1991 UN-brokered cease-fire was meant to give the Sahrawis a choice between autonomy under Moroccan rule or outright independence, the Moroccan monarchy has spent the past 11 years hindering, delaying and stalling, and no vote has taken place.
As far back as 1995, Human Rights Watch concluded that Morocco, "has regularly engaged in conduct that has obstructed and compromised the fairness of the referendum process." In February of this year, 23 US Congressmen wrote to President George W. Bush, accusing Morocco of having "created various obstacles to the referendum."
Meanwhile, some 200,000 Sahrawi refugees languish in camps in neighboring Algeria, living in terrible conditions and afraid of returning home. But the world, it seems, has little patience for such matters, preferring to court Morocco's King Muhammad VI rather than confront him about his country's policies. As a result, barely a peep is heard about the plight of Western Sahara.
Indeed, how often does the international media file reports bylined from "occupied Western Sahara"? How frequently do television and radio talk shows discuss Rabat's attempts to forge "Greater Morocco"? How many stories have appeared about gun-toting Moroccan settlers, backed by a trigger-happy army, moving in and displacing hapless Sahrawis from their homes? The answer, I think, speaks for itself.
The fact is that the media and various international groups place undue emphasis on the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, often bordering on obsession. We are bombarded so often with news and information about Israel and the Palestinians that it often seems to be the only crisis in the world, other than Iraq and terrorism.
Take, for example, the European Union, whose Council of Presidents met in Copenhagen last week for a two-day summit. In a statement released after the meeting, just two major international issues, aside from the Union's expansion, received special mention: the Iraq crisis, and the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, with the latter being the only conflict over borders to merit such attention.
And yet, there are plenty of other border disputes out there, some of which pose a potentially far greater threat to international peace and security. There was no mention in the EU statement of the India-Pakistan conflict over Kashmir, or of China's insatiable desire to swallow Taiwan, or even of Russia's ongoing war in Chechnya, despite the fact that the protagonists in these conflicts all possess arsenals of nuclear weapons.
Instead, the Europeans chose to devote their energies to sharply condemning the expansion of Jewish housing construction in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, as if the addition of an extra bathroom or the refurbishing of a Jewish family's kitchen somehow threatens to undermine global peace and stability.
This singular fixation on Israel is not only outlandish, but it is hypocritical as well. Jews may indeed be news, as the old saying goes, but that doesn't mean that all the news must be about Jews, and only about Jews. There are many other compelling human dramas out there, such as the Sahrawis of Western Sahara, which have yet to be scrutinized and dealt with.
But by leaving these stories untold, and instead focusing so intently on Israel, the international community is betraying not only its mandate, but its fairness and objectivity as well. And ultimately, that is to everyone's detriment.
Views expressed by the author do not
necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.
 
|
|
|
|
Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the  icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.
|
|
| |
|
