Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Diplomacy >

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
    Subscribe    
         










Rachel Neuwirth is a Los Angeles based analyst on the board of directors of the West Coast Region of the American Jewish Congress and the chairperson of its Middle East committee.
rachterry@sbcglobal.net
Previous views
An Israeli King Lear?
"Judenrein" Comes to Israel
Israel may be compelled to pre-empt
Target: Arafat
Militant Islam plays for keeps
Sharon promised security and gave us retreat instead
A Judenrein Palestine?
The prerequisite to peace
President Bush: Stick by your guns
Radically rethinking the Road Map
A two-state solution is no solution
Professor of lies, hate and terror

 
Pressuring Israel
By Rachel Neuwirth   July 18, 2004


Daniel Pipes recently called attention to the many disastrous unilateral concessions that Israel has made to the Arab Palestinian terrorist "leadership" since 1992, and the terrible price in dead, maimed and suffering people, not to mention a ruined economy, that Israel has paid for these concessions. In return, Israelis have received no benefits whatsoever.

Pipes attributes this willingness of Israel's government to make these unilateral concessions to the vanity of Israel's prime ministers, eager to secure their place in history by making peace with the Arabs. Without denying that Israeli prime ministers and other high officials of Israel are responsible for their decisions, it is essential that we accurately identify the motivations behind them. The single most important motive has not been the vanity of Israel's prime ministers, but relentless pressure from the United States, the European Community, and the United Nations.

The modern state of Israel has always been on the receiving end of pressure from its closest ally. Even before Israel had declared its independence in 1948, it had to endure relentless pressure from President Truman and Secretary of State George Marshall to renounce independent nationhood and submit to a United Nations trusteeship. In 1957, President Eisenhower and Secretary of State Dulles forced Israel to withdraw from the Sinai desert, which it had occupied in order to stop incessant terrorist attacks and an Egyptian blockade of its shipping, in return for an American promise to keep the vital Straight of Tiran waterway open to Israeli ships. When Egypt re-imposed the blockade ten years later, President Lyndon Johnson and his advisors claimed that they "couldn't find" his predecessor's pledge to Israel in U.S. government files, and declined to honor it.

When it became clear that Egypt and Syria were once again about to launch a massive attack on Israel in October 1973, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and President Richard Nixon applied brutal pressure on Prime Minister Golda Meir to refrain from a "preemptive" attack and to allow the Egyptians and Syrians to strike first, according to John Loftus in his 1997 book, The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People. The result was three thousand Israeli deaths.

Later, when Israel finally got the upper hand in the fighting, the United States forced it to accept a ceasefire before the Israelis could win a complete victory. Two years later, President Gerald Ford and Henry Kissinger (still the Secretary of State) forced the Israelis to withdraw unilaterally from the Suez Canal, even without a peace treaty with Egypt.

President Jimmy Carter pressured Prime Minister Menachem Begin to withdraw from the entire Sinai Peninsula in return for a peace treaty with Egypt. But Egypt has kept only a formal 'cold peace' with Israel ever since, continuing to indoctrinate its people in hatred for Israelis and Jews, all the while arming itself to the teeth.

President Ronald Reagan and his advisors mounted enormous pressure on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon in 1983, before it had ratified its peace treaty with Israel. The U.S. also pressed Israel to allow Yasser Arafat and his associates to flee Lebanon with their weapons, even though Israel could easily have killed or captured them. Syria was allowed to keep its troops in Lebanon, where they have been ever since. Twenty years of terror against Israel by both Lebanese and Palestinian groups have been the result.

President George Bush and Secretary of State James Baker squeezed Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir to halt the settlement of Judea and Samaria by denying the Israelis the loan guarantees they needed to absorb a huge exodus of Jewish refugees from Russia. When Shamir politely but firmly resisted these pressures, he paid a political price; he was not reelected, and the Israel Labor Party, more pliable to U.S. pressures, returned to office.

President Bill Clinton squeezed Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to agree to the withdrawal of Israeli soldiers from large areas of Judea and Samaria (the so-called "Wye Agreements"), leaving many of the Jewish communities there surrounded by Arab-controlled territory and very vulnerable to attack.

The list of instances of American pressure on Israel can go on and on.

But no administration has been more insistent on Israeli unilateral concessions to the Palestinian terrorists than that of our current President, George W. Bush. Mr. Bush and his Secretary of State, Colin Powell have demanded that Israel acquiesce in a Palestinian State. They have joined with the Europeans, Russia and the United Nations - the Quartet - to demand in their "road map" plan Israel's withdrawal to the indefensible pre-1967 armistice lines. They have extracted a promise from Prime Minister Ariel Sharon not to retaliate against arch-terrorist Yasser Arafat, even though there is no possibility of peace as long as Arafat remains in control of the terrorist apparatus. Whenever Israel has sent troops into Arab areas in order to root out the Palestinian terrorist infrastructure, the Bush Administration has demanded their quick withdrawal, before the Israeli soldiers could complete their mission.

George Bush recently endorsed the Gaza initial disengagement 'Sharon plan'. Then, the Arabs strongly protested and Bush caved and said that Judea-Samaria, including Jerusalem, will remain open to be negotiated between the parties. Within a few weeks of giving "assurances" to Sharon that the U.S. would not demand a return to the 1967 lines, the United States joined with the other Quartet powers, in calling for "an end to the occupation which began in 1967," and in affirming support for the Saudi plan, which calls for a complete withdrawal to the 1967 lines and the "return" of the Palestinian "refugees" to Israel. Bush-Powell bend to Arab pressure and treat Israel with a double standard when it comes to terrorism.

The Bush-Powell State Department has demanded that Israel dismantle some communities in Judea and Samaria and strangle others with ultra-strict prohibitions on growth. And it has opposed Israel's attempts to include Israeli communities outside the 1949 armistice lines - the so-called "Green Line" - within its purely defensive border fence. These communities, including Israeli neighborhoods in Jerusalem outside the Green Line, have a population of over 400,000.

Herein lies Israel's dilemma: Unless it acquiesces to U.S., European, and United Nations demands that it make unilateral concessions to the terrorists and allow them to take control of territory adjoining its main centers of population, the United States could cut off all aid to Israel, on which it depends for the weapons it needs to survive. A strong Israel, unwilling to bend to pressure, might also face economic sanctions from the entire "international community," or even military intervention by the European Community, which is in the process of developing its own intervention force, independent of NATO and the United States. Israel is threatened with total international isolation if it resists the pressure for international concessions, while it must endure endless terror and murder against its population if it knuckles under to the pressure - as, in fact, it has been experiencing since the present terrorist offensive began in September 2000.

American pressure is ever looming on Israeli leaders no matter what they say. Everything Israeli leaders do is with the U.S. in mind. It may appear to be their decision, but behind the scenes it is always made with U.S. wishes as a consideration. The last word is always with the U.S. administration. Nonetheless, Israel is still a sovereign, independent state, and its government has the capacity to act independently when, and if, its leaders have the courage to stand alone in defense of its vital interests. The Israeli people have a right to expect their leaders to adhere to this standard of courage.

There are some instances where Israeli leaders refused to cave in to American pressure, and the sky didn't fall in. When U.S. Secretary of State George Marshall warned Israel's future foreign minister, Moshe Shertok (name later changed to Sharett) against a declaration of a Jewish State, Israel's first Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion, and the entire leadership of the new nation decided to go ahead anyway. Israel survived the American effort to strangle it at birth, and is still here. Years later, President John Kennedy tried to pressure Israel to abandon its nuclear program, Ben Gurion resisted the pressure. As a result, Israel now has a nuclear deterrent. These examples prove that it is possible for Israel to resist unreasonable demands, even from the United States. Hence its leaders are responsible when they cave in to unreasonable demands.

Basically, Israel is alone, as it has always been. The Bible says that Israel is a nation that dwells alone. In the end, Israel/Jews were, are and will be used as scapegoats, whether by Bush or other leaders.

In the end, Israeli leaders are responsible for the poor decisions they have made since 1992, whatever external pressures may have been brought to bear on them. But Israel's friends here in America and elsewhere can do more to help Israelis by demanding that their own governments halt the pressure on them than by casting the whole blame for the appeasement of the terrorists on the shoulders of Israel's government. It is up to the people of Israel to remove from office those leaders who have knuckled under to external pressures to appease their enemies; and it is up to us, as Americans, to replace leaders who have harassed our one true ally in the Middle East: Israel.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |