 |
Phyllis Chesler , PhD, is an Emerita Professor of Psychology and Women's Studies and the author of twelve books including . More information about her can be found on her .
|
|
|
|
By Phyllis Chesler
October 11, 2004
Dear President Brodhead:
Greetings!
I am writing to you as a member of Duke's extended family of scholars. As you may know, my archives reside at Duke University as part of a distinguished collection of feminist intellectuals and activists. Indeed, my archives were Duke's first major acquisition in this area.
You have in your possession a treasure trove of my research, published and unpublished manuscripts, interviews, course curricula, and worldwide civil rights activism from the early 1960's on. Duke acquired my papers in 1992 and I have continued to hand over materials ever since. Other important acquisitions that followed mine include those of Kate Millett, Alix Kates Shulman, Merle Hoffman, Robin Morgan, and others.
I am also one of 107 signatories to a letter recently sponsored by the Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies addressed to Secretary of State Colin Powell on behalf of the Global Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, (HR 4230), which would have the United States monitor and combat anti-Semitism worldwide.
Other signatories include current and former Senators, Congressmen, Ambassadors, theologians, and educators including the Reverend Dr. Joseph Hough, Jr., President of the Union Theological Seminary, Dr. Harold W. Attridge, Dean of the Yale University Divinity School, Dr. Maxine Clarke Beach, Dean of the Drew University Theological School, Sister Rose Thering, author James Carroll, and R. James Woolsey, Jack Kemp, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Cynthia Ozick, Richard Perle, and Gary Wills.
I understand that Duke University will be hosting a Palestinian Solidarity Movement (PSM) conference. I also understand that you and certain faculty members believe that doing so constitutes your commitment to free speech and academic freedom. Ironically, Duke will be supporting a group (which is also known as the International Solidarity Movement), which does not believe in free speech or democracy and which endorses violence, mass murder, Jew-hatred, and homicidal-suicide terrorism.
But, you might say, America prides itself on extending its civil rights, including that of free speech to racist groups and to their hate speech. Let me respectfully suggest that, post 9/11, America may no longer do so without risking grievous consequences both in terms of lives lost and truth abandoned.
President Brodhead: Would you proudly host a Nazi Party or Ku Klux Klan conference in the name of academic freedom? Given your commitment to the First Amendment, would you still allow the meeting to take place behind closed doors with no press allowed? I understand that this is what the Palestine Solidarity Movement conference planners have demanded. As you know, a free and vigorous press is one of our protections against tyranny. What issue cannot bear the cleansing light of scrutiny?
But why is Duke giving any intellectual credibility to what is bound to be a hate-fest? Under President Rudenstine, Harvard, which like Duke is also a private institution, resolved that it would not allow any hate-speech conferences. The Harvard Divinity School also returned United Arab Emirate monies from the Sheikh Zayed Foundation no doubt earmarked for such purposes. Perhaps Duke can consider doing this as well. The PSM/ISM are precisely the kinds of groups that European governments, beginning with Germany, have begun to monitor in terms of their terrorism potential. Why is Duke granting them an aura of intellectual respectability?
In my view, the masked and hooded members of al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Al Fatah, and the al-Aqsa's Martyrs Brigade which the PSM and their allies support are far more dangerous than the Nazis or the Klan ever were. Their terrorism against civilians, especially in Israel, but also worldwide, is both state-sanctioned and trans-national. Their propaganda against Jews and Israelis is based on doctored footage, photo-opportunity journalism, and sophisticated post-Orwellian lies.
The Palestine Solidarity Movement and their allies chant "Death to the Jews," and "Death to America," at what they describe as peace rallies; they characterize the mass murder of civilians as "resistance to oppression;" they preach the destruction of Israel and the murder of all infidels in Arabic but then, in English, French, and German, claim that they have been misunderstood, that they really meant the opposite of what they said.
President Brodhead: Until now, I have been proud to be associated with Duke. However, as a Duke family member, I am distressed by Duke's decision to host the PSM conference but I am even more distressed by Duke's failure, so far, to fund and host very different kinds of programs in this area.
Some academics and educators might say that PSM's/ISM's hate speech and lies are only words and cannot hurt anyone. They might also say that honoring diverse and controversial words are precisely what American universities should do. At some other time in history, and perhaps in terms of other subjects, I might agree with you. However, the level of hate-propaganda against Israel and Jews is surreal, global, sophisticated, and deadly.
During this latest Palestinian-led and Arab and Iranian-backed Intifada (2000-2004), such propaganda has both led to and yet rendered invisible the highest civilian body count in Israel's history. In American demographic terms, by now America would have suffered approximately 45,000 civilian deaths at the hands of terrorists and approximately 280,000 civilians wounded, often seriously, and for life. More than half would have been women and children. Only Israel's unilateral creation of a security barrier has begun to staunch the flood of Israeli blood.
The Islamists, whom the PSM supports, torture and impoverish their own people, sacrifice their own children, practice slavery, and commit genocide. They terrorize their own citizens, especially intellectuals, women, and homosexuals. Nevertheless, many "politically correct" academics have romanticized these barbarians even the billionaire bin Laden and the multi-millionaire Arafat as humiliated and impoverished freedom fighters.
I have written about this betrayal of the truth and of the Jews in my twelfth and latest book: The New Anti-Semitism. The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It. Most "politically correct" academics, including feminists, have joined left-alliances which single out only Israel for imaginary crimes and misdemeanors. They say that Israel is an Apartheid and Nazi state; it is not. But, as one of Duke's pioneer feminists, let me indeed briefly focus on Apartheid as a feminist issue.
Islam today is the largest practitioner of both gender and religious Apartheid in the world. Women who live under Islam are, variously, murdered outright in honor killings and oppressed by forced veiling, segregation, sequestration, stoning to death for alleged adultery, female genital mutilation, polygamy, forced marriage to men old enough to be their grandfather, and by domestic and sexual slavery.
Women have few, if any, civil, legal, or human rights under Islam today. In addition, under Islam, all non-Muslims Christians, Jews, Assyrians, Hindus, Zoroastrians, animists have historically been viewed and treated as subhuman and accorded "dhimmi" status. Today, except for the small country of Israel, all 22 nation states in the Arab Muslim Middle East are Judenrein (free of Jews); Christians there remain at serious risk.
You will probably not hear anyone at the PSM conference address Apartheid in this way and to fail to do so is to fail the requirements of objectivity and scholarship. "Free" speech is not always "true" speech. Universities have an obligation to teach the truth as much as they may also wish to model tolerance for all speech, including that which bears no relationship to the truth. Thus, in the interests of free, true speech, may I suggest that Duke:
Allow the media in to cover the PSM conference.
Allow the conference to be taped so that you and others will see what is being said.
Sponsor a pro-democracy and pro-Israel conference, one which reflects a wide spectrum of opinion, not only that of the left-wing Israeli Oslo and Geneva accordianists. This should be an inter-faith and inter-disciplinary effort. The Jewish community should not be expected to monitor Jew-hatred and educate against it by themselves. In addition, such a conference should feature Arab Christians, as well as Lebanese Maronite Christians who are the descendants of Phoenicians and pre-date the Arab conquest of Arabia.
Sponsor an international conference on Gender and Religious Apartheid.
Sponsor a conference on the feminist challenge to and transformation of patriarchal religions. As yet, perhaps due to funding limitations, none of my extensive work as a feminist activist within Judaism and within Israel, especially as a co-leader of the Women of the Wall struggle in Jerusalem, has been made available to scholars or Duke students nor has any of my work as an anti-racist activist not only on behalf of minorities of color but also on behalf of Jews been made available.
We live in dangerous times. Keeping a low and "neutral" profile, trying to please and appease all sides -- especially the most violent side is unwise. One must take a stand against radical evil and injustice. I hope and pray that you will do exactly that.
All the best,
Phyllis Chesler, Ph.D.
Update: After I sent this letter, I called both President Brodhead and John Burness, Duke's Senior Vice President for Public Affairs. I also continued to call the directors of the Freeman Center for Jewish Life at Duke who have not yet returned my calls. (I am told that they are both overwhelmed and limited in what they can do since they are largely funded by Duke.)
Vice President Burness called me back and we had an amiable conversation on speaker. Four days after I first published my letter, I received a written response from VP Burness. According to the letter. the media may indeed register and attend the conference. However, the student group which is sponsoring the conference has prohibited the use of cameras and tape recorders; the administration's hands are, pro forma, tied.
Although the letter does not refer to it, in our phone conversation VP Burness stated that the university was not banning protestors, that they expected some protest and were making the necessary arrangements for safety and security. However, VP Burness writes that he "cannot dispute (my) point that free speech is not always true speech." He does quote President Brodhead's view that "All ideas are not equal, but it is a foundational principle of American life that all ideas should have an equal opportunity to be expressed." In addition, VP Burness states that the Palestine Solidarity Movement and the International Solidarity Movement are "separate" organizations, albeit with overlapping members and leaders. He also outlines other Freeman Center programming at Duke between October 15-17, and a "year long" series of lectures which might better present the "Israeli" point of view.
I spoke with Rachel Fish of the David Project who confirmed that The Freeman Center is sponsoring a peace concert and a speakout which will feature the victims of terrorist violence. However, Fish told me, "they do not want any Jewish Israeli victims speaking and they do not want any speakers to blame Arabs or Muslims for the terrorism. To do so would be viewed as politically incorrect and insensitive." In addition, the Freeman Center initially invited only the Geneva Accordianists Avram Burg and Yossi Beilin to speak.
As of this writing, only Burg will be speaking. After demanding to be heard and agreeing to fund themselves, two members of the David Project will also be presenting at Duke. Based on several sources I have also learned that the Conservative Student Union at Duke has invited Daniel Pipes to speak on October 14. They did so months ago as a way of protesting the presence of the PSM on campus. The Freeman Center is now also co-sponsoring Pipes's speech.
Views expressed by the author do not
necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.
 
|
|
|
|
Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the  icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.
|
|
| |
|
|
