Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
"Disengagement" Plan

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
    Subscribe    
         










Dr. Aaron Lerner is co-founder of IMRA, Independent Media Review and Analysis, an Israel-based news organization which provides an extensive digest of media, polls and significant interviews and events relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
imra@netvision.net.il
Previous views
The Jericho test case
Post-retreat vision?
Cavalier attitude towards Egyptian treaty violations
Civil Disobedience: Boomerang for disengagement?
Taking Rice's prisoner release request seriously means freeing Pollard
Only a referendum can preserve Israel's social contract
For Abbas, collecting illegal weapons begins at home
Legal? Maybe. But Not Legitimate.
Israeli lives take precedence over those of "terror shields"
Likud leadership's avarice leaves Sharon naked
Entrusting Egyptians, Sharon giving up fight against Gaza arms smuggling
The Palestinian guns are cocked
Show the Palestinians respect by expecting compliance
Time to tell Bush the truth
The "rebel" Likud bunnies scurry back to their holes
Does Netanyahu underestimate his standing?
Only a referendum on retreat honors the Israeli social contract
Retreat driven by spinelessness, not reason
Retreat plans prevent "Days of Penitence" from succeeding

More from Dr. Aaron Lerner..

 
Netanyahu, Livnat, Shalom: Profiles in Courage or Realpolitik?
By Dr. Aaron Lerner   October 15, 2004


In 1954-55 a freshman U.S. Senator from Massachusetts wrote a book profiling eight of his historical Senatorial colleagues, such men as John Quincy Adams, Sam Houston, and Robert A. Taft. Instead of focusing on their storied careers, John F. Kennedy chose to illustrate their acts of integrity, when they stood alone against tremendous political and social pressure for what they felt was right.

During the course of this second Sharon administration, a number of leading Likud figures were given the opportunity to be recorded in Israel's own "Profiles in Courage."

Binyamin Netanyahu, Limor Livnat and Silvan Shalom all knew that the Road Map was a disastrous plan for Israel. We know that because they said as much in remarks in the period leading up to the cabinet vote.

But instead of rallying support to defeat the plan, they folded, hiding behind the fig leaf of the "14 Israeli remarks" -- Israeli terms and interpretations that were never accepted by the other parties -- including the United States.

Binyamin Netanyahu, Limor Livnat and Silvan Shalom all knew that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's disengagement plan was a disastrous plan for Israel. We know that because they said as much in remarks in the period leading up to the cabinet vote.

But again, instead of rallying support to defeat the plan, they folded, hiding behind the fig leaf of the "staggered withdrawals" that would first serve up some of the more isolated communities to the retreat Moloch with the idea that somehow circumstances would develop so that the remaining communities would never be uprooted.

Sharon has now even denied Netanyahu, Livnat and Shalom this fig leaf, making it clear that the uprooting will take place rapidly and in a continuous, rather than staggered, program.

Binyamin Netanyahu, Limor Livnat and Silvan Shalom. All leading Likud politicians on track to be prime minister one day. And they are not about to let anything get in their way.

Guilt? Hardly. Thanks to their considerable self esteem, they are all convinced that once they do finally become prime minister they will be able to control the damage caused by the various plans and programs that they declined to defeat when they were "only" ministers.

Under other circumstances, the decision by Netanyahu, Livnat and Shalom to turn their backs on the wishes of the Likud rank and file as well as Likud Central Committee in order to keep on what they see as the track to the prime minister's chair would be political suicide. And it would be if a serious contender for the chair had voted according to his conscience rather than his immediate political needs.

But, unfortunately, this is not the case (or at least not perceived as the case) today.

Minister Uzi Landau and his group of Likud loyalists are short only a few votes from defeating Sharon's retreat plan in the Knesset. (They are called "rebels" when in point of fact it is the prime minister who has rebelled against the clear rejection of disengagement by the Likud party referendum vote as well as the votes of the Central Committee.)

It is not too late for this trio -- and their fellow "rebels" -- to set aside narrow personal agendas and take their place among Israel's "Profiles in Courage."

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |