Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Politics >

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
    Subscribe    
         











P. David Hornik P. David Hornik is a freelance writer and translator living in Jerusalem whose work has appeared in many Israeli, Jewish, and political publications. Reach him at:
pdavidh2001@yahoo.com
Previous views
An oasis in the Negev for radical leftists
The other elections
Israeli agency sheds light on terror axis
The speech Ariel Sharon should give
A time to resist, soberly
Palestinian Weapons: Ominous Facts
The Media's Arafest
Father of Terror's death even worse than his life
Don't disengage from the truth
Ten personal pearls of Jewish wisdom
Want to be a terror master? You're dead.
Training in Zion
Keeping Jews out of Judea
All quiet on the Israeli front?
Zionism against itself
Peace of the High Places
Questions for Ariel Sharon
Israel's Gaza gamble
The strange case of Bethlehem

More from P. David Hornik..

 
Sharon vs. Israel
By P. David Hornik   December 5, 2004


I used to try to understand things, but not anymore, or not much. Instead I shuffle, dazed, from one jolt to the next -- maybe reacting, not trying to look into the obscure depths.

One thing I won't try to understand is why Ariel Sharon, once a great fighter for Israel, has turned into a warrior against our security and viability.

Less than two years ago, in March 2003, an optimal Likud-National Union-Mafdal-Shinui government emerged from the elections. It combined Zionism, nationalism, moderate religion, and realism on both security/diplomatic and economic matters. In its short tenure, it finally started to fight terror seriously, and its finance minister, Netanyahu -- backed by Shinui and parts of the other parties -- took bold steps to challenge the bureaucracies, banks, and unions that hold the Israeli economy in a stranglehold and prevent its true, dazzling potential from emerging.

And now, thanks to Arik Sharon, that government is gone, kaput, finished.

I voted for that government, Arik Sharon -- specifically for your Likud Party, but I was happy with the coalition that formed and felt represented by it. That 2003 election, Arik Sharon, was most of all a repudiation of Oslo. The ranks of the two Osloite parties, Labor and Meretz, were slashed and they slunk off into opposition. The results also said, Arik, that we didn't want non-Zionist Haredim "representing" us anymore.

I was glad to see our first haredi-less government in a quarter-century, Arik Sharon, and it's not because I'm against Judaism but for exactly the opposite reason.

There is nothing that causes more alienation from Judaism -- which eventually becomes alienation from Zionism and from Israel itself -- than the sight of "religious" political parties whose main activity is to siphon off taxpayers' funds for institutions in which they train generations that are almost nonfunctional in modern life, people who cannot serve in an army, don't know science or English, can do little but live on the dole while studying what they call "Torah" -- and all this in the name of our great Jewish tradition.

That's what we repudiated, Arik Sharon -- the peacenik Left and the non-Zionist "religious" -- and now, thanks solely to you, it's all coming back. A Likud-Labor-haredi coalition awaits us. Once again Shimon Peres, the delusional father of Oslo terror, will be trotting around to capitals making deals in our name, while haredi MKs will finagle their funds and crush respect for Judaism in Israeli hearts.

Well, it was Golda Meir who once said that if Sharon didn't get his way, he'd surround the Knesset with tanks. Not quite: you didn't surround this Knesset with tanks, Arik, but you managed to bulldoze it by political means, which included ignoring votes you swore to honor and firing ministers for the crime of standing up for the people's will.

And all in the name of what turned out to be your single fixed idea, the sole thing that really interested you -- disengagement. The exact platform of the candidate, Mitzna, you ran against and defeated in a landslide in 2003.

Ah yes, disengagement. Just last week we heard the latest installment -- that 700 Egyptian border policemen are now going to replace our soldiers along the Philadelphi Route to protect us from arms smuggling. And you're quoted as saying that if the smuggling stops, Gaza's air and sea ports will open again too.

Arik, this is disengagement from sanity and responsibility. A decade ago, over your howls of anger and stern warnings, PLO terrorists were imported to Judea and Samaria to guard our security. Now, what you've apparently worked out for us in your experience, sagacity, and brilliance is that soldiers of the most virulently anti-Semitic society in the world will be standing there to stop the heavy artillery from pouring into Gaza.

And if they succeed -- or say they succeed; who's going to check, Shimon Peres? -- the portals of Gaza will be open to an influx of jihadi weaponry that will make the Karine A look like a fishing boat.

The disengagement hasn't happened yet, Arik, but already the assurances sound eerily like all those Oslo assurances. Then we were told that it was just an experiment and that if anything went wrong, a terror attack or two, we'd go right back into those areas and disarm the terrorists.

Now, on disengagement, we've been told -- that it's just Gaza and a few Samaria settlements and the real aim is to save the rest of the territories; or that it's not really disengagement because the IDF will maintain control of the Philadelphi route and the air and sea ports. It's deja vu all over again, Arik, and no wonder you're so eager to have Peres by your side.

Why are you doing it all, Arik -- tearing apart the government we elected, reviving the forces we wanted to banish, putting our security, economy, and morale right back in the jeopardy you were supposed to rescue them from? I don't presume to explain it, but I'm wondering if the conspiracy theorists have a point. I don't know what goes on in the depths, what corrupt or sinister forces might be behind all this, but I can say that the reality that meets my eyes no longer makes any sense.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |