Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Diplomacy > "Peace Process"

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
    Subscribe    
         










Bruce S. Ticker of Philadelphia is publisher of CRISIS: ISRAEL.
Brucetic@aol.com
Previous views
Bad Omens
Words can't bring them back
The peace process is being cut to pieces
A contiguous lie
Cheney's clothes don't unmake the mensch
Abbas talks, Jews die
A new Jewish holiday
The Arabs asked for war
1000 Israeli deaths
Arab barrier to barrier
The mensch and the maniac
Another day, another outrage
How the barrier really threatens Arabs
Collective harassment
The case against Rachel Corrie
From Jenin to Rafiah
Terrorizing the terrorists
Praying in fear
Touching a nerve

Israel, Palestinians agree on handover of second West Bank town
Israel, Palestinians deadlock on handover of Tulkarm
Violent clashes between Israelis and Palestinians in Jerusalem and Ramallah
Sharon: Cairo Palestinian statement is "positive first step"
Route of Jerusalem barrier to enclose settlement, holy site, refugee camp
Military Intelligence Chief: Israel risking lives for Abbas
Views: The Jericho test case
Views: Coexistence in a hospital room
Israel, Palestinians fail to work out Jericho handover

 
Acts of War
By Bruce S. Ticker   April 1, 2005


"We will not tolerate such acts."

So declared Palestinian security advisor Jibril Rajoub in a New York Times article following the Feb. 25 murders of five young Israelis waiting in line at a Tel Aviv nightclub.

Too late. The Palestinian leadership already did "tolerate such acts."

The Times article opens by posing the wrong question: "A month after it was reached, is the truce between the Israelis and Palestinians gaining traction or starting to slip?"

Five young Israelis die in a bombing, and perhaps the truce is "starting to slip?"

A far more practical question: Why should Israel bother pursuing a diplomatic relationship with the "Palestinians?"

It is getting tougher to find a reason. The Arabs talk of rounding up the culprits, one victim's father vows revenge, Israelis concede that the Palestinian leadership has taken positive steps and the Times account takes note of the reduction in violence.

Just one drawback: They cannot return life to the bodies of the five Israelis. They were murdered in what, plain and simple, was an act of war, and there have been other acts of war. Israel has every right to officially declare a state of war.

Not that I'm advocating such a course. It is far too complicated for that. However, on its merits the Feb. 25 bombing in Tel Aviv was an act of war, and that has been followed by lesser acts of war in which innocent people were wounded or endangered. An obvious obstacle to retaliation is, well, who does Israel retaliate against? There has been confusion over who did it and how they are supported. Israeli officials have accused Syria of being behind the attack, but nobody knows for certain.

The Palestinian Authority cannot be blamed, it would seem. Yet this bombing was the latest fatal manifestation of the Arab world's hostility toward Israel that has endured for more than a century. Palestinian leaders may well sympathize with the victims' families and wish they could turn the clock back, but they have been part of this conflict for decades.

The Arab world created this aggression and lost control of it long ago. Some Arabs entered the war against Israel willingly, some felt overwhelming pressure to fight Israel while making overtures for peace behind the scenes. Some Arab leaders, such as the late King Hussein of Jordan, were freed by events of recent years to alter their approach. Other Arab leaders changed both their approach and attitudes. All the same, together they contributed to the environment that fed the Tel Aviv killings.

The most realistic alternative to negotiations for Israel would be to pull out of many of the settlements and wall itself off from the Palestinians. If terrorists manage to attack Israel in some way, such as with rocket attacks, Israel can retaliate in any manner that is effective.

Israel is still working with the Palestinian Authority, and maybe it should. But with the finality of the five deaths, it is hard to accept that.

The Times story, published on March 6, ticked off a series of violent incidents which have occurred in the past few weeks that include a shootout at a Palestinian police station in Jenin, the explosion of a car bomb that injured five Palestinians and discovery of a rocket-making factory. All that does is compound the case for complete separation.

It would be ideal if Israel and the Palestinians can build a serious relationship. Both sides would benefit. Cooperation between the two parties would facilitate the ready provision of services and the flow of trade, and strengthen their relationships with other nations which can help them both. As long as they can work together, Israel should do all it can do within reason to help the Palestinians get on their feet.

Israel must yet be careful and prepared for the day when it may need to break off relations with the Palestinians. Excusing the murders of five of its citizens is not within reason.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |