Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Diplomacy > Media Objectivity

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Bruce S. Ticker of Philadelphia is publisher of CRISIS: ISRAEL.
Brucetic@aol.com
Previous views
Why should Israel deal with the Arabs now?
No Jewish green for greenhouses
Keep Israeli troops in Gaza?
Arab 'kids' take each others' marbles
The defining moment
Into the Abbas
A brokered solution
Mahmoud, you're fired!
Acts of War
Bad Omens
Words can't bring them back
The peace process is being cut to pieces
A contiguous lie
Cheney's clothes don't unmake the mensch
Abbas talks, Jews die
A new Jewish holiday
The Arabs asked for war
1000 Israeli deaths
Arab barrier to barrier

Views: The wrong reporter gets arrested
Views: Flush Newsweek down the toilet
Has the media silently conspired to protect PM Sharon?
Israel and the 'War of the Words'
British government rolls out red carpet for anti-Israel BBC reporter
Views: Does the Media's anti-Israel bias matter?
Views: Fit to print
Views: War of the Words
Views: Rules For Middle East Reporters

 
The BBC commission of omissions
By Bruce S. Ticker   October 18, 2005


Critics have already blasted, correctly so, the BBC documentary - "Elusive Peace: Israel and the Arabs" -- for its pro-Arab bias.

When I got the chance to see it on my local Public Broadcasting Service station, I noticed some more misrepresentations which need to be mentioned. All of it was in BBC's commission of omissions. Here are three examples.

The documentary, which was broadcast on PBS stations on Monday, Oct. 10, neglects to answer these grave questions: What led to the construction of the security barrier? What minor detail was discovered in Jenin? What did Suha Arafat tell her hubby's lieutenants when Yasser was on his deathbed a year ago?

Omission 1. In Israel?s invasion of Jenin in the West Bank, where a large United Nations-run refugee camp is located, the documentary includes film in which Arab leaders accuse Israel of a massacre in which hundreds of civilians were killed.

In concluding this segment, the narrator reports that it turns out that not so many Arabs were killed, but 49 bodies were later recovered, 14 of whom were civilians. Meaning? Israel still killed civilians.

Since the producers reported on the aftermath, it is too bad they did not bother to mention that Israel discovered an armed stronghold at Jenin. The fact that this stronghold was located at a refugee camp meant that UN rules were blatantly violated. Military activity at a refugee camp is illegal, and UN officials could not have possibly missed that this kind of activity.

Omission 2. In reporting on the security barrier, the producers employed a "he said, she said" approach to explaining the conflict. Israeli officials said that the barrier was needed to prevent the murderous bombings and the Arabs claimed that the barrier was intended to appropriate their land.

The producers neglected to mention that the Israeli public was clamoring for a barrier. In fact, Israelis of all political stripes were on the same page on this issue. Jerusalem Report magazine reported that leaders of individual municipalities started a drive to build a barrier themselves. Settler advocates opposed the barrier because they feared it would set pre-determined boundaries that would eliminate many existing settlements.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon dragged his feet on this concern, probably because of pressure from settler leaders. Soon after the Jerusalem Report article appeared, Sharon took control of the situation and built the barrier on his terms.

Omission 3. By the time Yasser Arafat died on Nov. 11, 2004, it was well documented that the number of bombings had plunged, nearly to none. While the film ended with Arafat?s death, the producers did not see fit to mention that minor detail.

In mentioning Arafat?s death, they omitted the spectacle of Suha Arafat bickering with Arab leaders over the billions of dollars that her husband kept for himself. Initially, she would not tell them anything about the money, but apparently they ultimately made a deal so she could continue living her lavish lifestyle in Paris while the "poor Palestinians" remain impoverished.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |