Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
US foreign policy

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Dr. Aaron Lerner is co-founder of IMRA, Independent Media Review and Analysis, an Israel-based news organization which provides an extensive digest of media, polls and significant interviews and events relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
imra@netvision.net.il
Previous views
Compensation for administrative detention: a small step forward
Rice soft on Hamas and disarming Palestinian terrorists
What did the Likud Central Committee vote mean?
Difference between Sharon-Peres and Netanyahu or Landau is fundamental
Has Israeli deterrence become a farce?
The Landau Candidacy
What President Katzav Could Have Said
False disengagement assertions
Israel Police to deny basic rights inside Green Line?
Israeli Police Commissioner and IDF Chief of Staff fail under pressure
Post-retreat issues that cannot be ignored
Deadly cliches of retreat
Sharon isn't fiddling as Israel burns
Will disengagement really take place?
The Demographic Problem: Excuse Of last resort for a Palestinian State
Sharon's visit to America misses chance to set diplomatic agenda
I have no other country, despite disengagement
Has Israel's Military Intelligence chief gone soft on Egypt?
Israeli complacency in the face of anti-aircraft missiles

Views: Wish lists, American and Syrian
State chides Israel after attacks: "Ease the plight of the Palestinian people"
Palestinian delegation surprised to get Bush
Views: Rice soft on Hamas and disarming Palestinian terrorists
White House denies Palestinian claim that Bush said God directed policy
Views: American foreign policy is in shambles

 
Bush proves soft on Palestinian security compliance
By Dr. Aaron Lerner   October 21, 2005


To Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas' credit, from the very first day he recognized that when it comes to the Palestinians, the Bush team isn't really serious about security compliance, that the White House is more interested in the melody than the lyrics.

That's why Abbas can consistently say flat out that he has no intention to confront the illegal armed militias and it doesn't matter.

That's why Abbas could make it perfectly clear -- as he stood next to President Bush in the White House today -- that he has no intention to collect weapons before the elections.

And that's why Abbas can repeatedly explain that, at best, his idea of "one gun" is that ultimately all the terrorists generously agree to be on the PA's payroll.

Sure, Mr. Bush talks the talk about the need for the Palestinians to fight terror -- but his carefully crafted remarks, wrapped in praise for Abbas, are bereft of any clear timetable or measurable standards for action.

This is nothing new.

A few weeks ago Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice responded to a question at Princeton University about America being soft on Hamas with a carefully crafted statement that was not only soft on Hamas but soft on Palestinian terror in general.

Instead of calling on the Palestinian Authority to immediately disarm the terrorists, Rice showed understanding for this taking an open-ended period of time. "There are periods of time of transition in which one has to give some space to the participants, in this case the Palestinians, to begin to come to a new national compact. Eventually", the Secretary of State explained, they have to be disarmed.

Paradoxically, rather than help Abbas, Mr. Bush is sending a message to the Palestinian street that there isn't any genuine pressure for the PA to take serious steps against the terror infrastructure.

The deleterious absence of pressure from Washington on the Palestinian leadership isn't limited to security matters. The PLO could readily inject hundreds of millions of dollars from its "war chest" today to alleviate the situation in the Gaza Strip rather than hold out for contributions, but instead Washington acts as if Arafat took the PLO's holdings with him to his
grave.

This shortsighted approach is a disservice to the Palestinians, Israel and the entire region.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |