Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Politics > Labor

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Dr. Aaron Lerner is co-founder of IMRA, Independent Media Review and Analysis, an Israel-based news organization which provides an extensive digest of media, polls and significant interviews and events relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
imra@netvision.net.il
Previous views
Does it honor Rabin to distort his message?
Operation of passage points: not a question of "if" but "how"
Bush proves soft on Palestinian security compliance
Compensation for administrative detention: a small step forward
Rice soft on Hamas and disarming Palestinian terrorists
What did the Likud Central Committee vote mean?
Difference between Sharon-Peres and Netanyahu or Landau is fundamental
Has Israeli deterrence become a farce?
The Landau Candidacy
What President Katzav Could Have Said
False disengagement assertions
Israel Police to deny basic rights inside Green Line?
Israeli Police Commissioner and IDF Chief of Staff fail under pressure
Post-retreat issues that cannot be ignored
Deadly cliches of retreat
Sharon isn't fiddling as Israel burns
Will disengagement really take place?
The Demographic Problem: Excuse Of last resort for a Palestinian State
Sharon's visit to America misses chance to set diplomatic agenda

Peretz knows poverty and power
Peres suspects fraud in Labor Party leadership race
Peretz grabs Labor Party victory to Peres, vows to quit government
Barak to bow out of party primaries
"Irregularities" cause Labor primaries delay
Barak calls Peres a "loser"
Pines rises above the rest in Labor race for cabinet seats
Ehud Barak rages on stage, accusing Peres of stealing Labor party
Views: Ringworm and Radiation

 
After the "Peretz Earthquake"
By Dr. Aaron Lerner   November 11, 2005


The surprise victory of Histadrut labor federation chairman Amir Peretz over VPM Shimon Peres in the Labor Party primaries this morning puts an end to speculation as to whether or not Israel will have early general elections.

There will be.

It is far from clear, however, how this election will play out.

Will Peretz succeed in making economics the dominant issue of the campaign?

One can certainly argue with Peretz's socialist economic views -- a clear preference to re-divide rather than enlarge the economic pie -- but one cannot ignore that he enters the arena with the advantage of having a very clear economic philosophy and the ability to communicate it to the voters.

Binyamin Netanyahu's certainly has a clear economic philosophy, and he has demonstrated as treasury minister that it works in practice . But there is a large population of voters who may not have the patience to wait for the benefits of the expanding economic pie Netanyahu promises to benefit them and would prefer Peretz's promise to give them a bigger slice of the
existing pie today.

On the other hand, if the issue remains "guns" rather than "butter", Peretz is at a considerable disadvantage in light of his lack of any background in either defense or foreign affairs as well as his leftist views.

Netanyahu's identification with an economic policy that is the polar opposite to Peretz may put him at a disadvantage over alternative Likud candidates since others can more credibly adopt some of Peretz's demands (for example increasing the minimum wage to a livable wage, increasing transfer payments to the poor elderly, etc.) to knock much of the wind out
of his sails so that the "guns" remain the decisive issues in the campaign.

And what of a break-away Sharon party?

It would certainly be tempting to try to put together a list of Likud and Labor personalities to take votes from both parties, but the gross failure of pollsters to predict the Peretz victory serves as a warning that political machinations driven by polling data are far from being a sure bet.

A Sharon party would also be, by its nature, totally dependent on the vote drawing ability of Ariel Sharon, and that is a function both of how Sharon's retreat plays out before the elections and Attorney General Mazuz.

Post-retreat security arrangements are certainly considerably inferior to what the Sharon team anticipated and post-retreat Gaza is a source of ever increasing concerns, but it remains to be seen if the situation will reach a boiling point before or only after Israelis go to the polls.

If indicted, Sharon would not be able to serve as prime minister. Mazuz wasn't expected to allow the wheels of justice to interfere with the implementation of Sharon's retreat, but it was far from clear just how long this policy would continue. Reports in the press that Sharon intends to retreat to "final borders" if diplomacy fails may make concerns regarding the possibility that Mazuz might indict Sharon moot.

Will the advanced elections have an impact on Israel's willingness to make further concessions on security arrangement at the passages?

Will Washington try to strike a balance between its desire to help Abbas in the Palestinian elections (by pressing Israel to make security concessions) and an interest to avoid hurting Sharon's election prospects?

One thing is certain: Peretz's victory brings Israel considerably closer to finally providing its citizens with the opportunity to express their will for the first time since Mr. Sharon exploited his landslide anti-retreat election campaign victory to implement the very policy he opposed.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |