Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Politics > Elections 2006

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Dr. Aaron Lerner is co-founder of IMRA, Independent Media Review and Analysis, an Israel-based news organization which provides an extensive digest of media, polls and significant interviews and events relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
imra@netvision.net.il
Previous views
Clear Choices for a Change
After the "Peretz Earthquake"
Does it honor Rabin to distort his message?
Operation of passage points: not a question of "if" but "how"
Bush proves soft on Palestinian security compliance
Compensation for administrative detention: a small step forward
Rice soft on Hamas and disarming Palestinian terrorists
What did the Likud Central Committee vote mean?
Difference between Sharon-Peres and Netanyahu or Landau is fundamental
Has Israeli deterrence become a farce?
The Landau Candidacy
What President Katzav Could Have Said
False disengagement assertions
Israel Police to deny basic rights inside Green Line?
Israeli Police Commissioner and IDF Chief of Staff fail under pressure
Post-retreat issues that cannot be ignored
Deadly cliches of retreat
Sharon isn't fiddling as Israel burns
Will disengagement really take place?

Another one bites the dust: Leftist MK Yossi Sarid calls it quits
Views: The Likud and the Jewish Agenda
Views: Forward? Indeed. Over a cliff.
Views: Clear Choices for a Change
Sharon holds talks with Peretz and others to set early election date

 
Framing elections as retreat referendum could defeat Sharon
By Dr. Aaron Lerner   December 1, 2005


While Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plans to carry out a major retreat in Judea and Samaria after the elections certainly appeal to the elements in the Left now supporting his "Kadima" Party, the Israeli public overwhelmingly rejects his scheme.

Turn the upcoming Knesset elections into a referendum on unilateral withdrawal instead of a personality contest and Kadima will plummet.

That's the challenge facing the national camp.

And it remains to be seen if the personalities running the campaigns of the national camp parties will realize that the retreat issue is their only solid hope to whittle down the support this essentially one-man party enjoys to what should be its natural size.

Play the corruption card? Polls show the public knows full well that Sharon is corrupt but they don't care.

Highlight commitment to social-welfare policy? Make this the defining issue of the campaign and you are just another "me too".

Remind voters about the lefties in Kadima? It may convince some voters to "come home" but Sharon is running as the man on the horse who does what he wants, when he wants to, and could give a damn what anyone else says (or for that matter what he himself may have said before), so the composition of his party is of secondary importance.

Israel loves this ultimate man on the horse.

But Israel doesn't want the retreat Sharon is planning.

A poll of a representative sample of 500 adult Israeli Jews carried out by Smith Research & Consulting on 29-30 November and sponsored by ZOA -- The Zionist Organization of America -- finds that 67% oppose carrying out a significant unilateral withdrawal from Judea and Samaria if it is not possible to advance in negotiations with the Palestinians on the basis of
the Road Map after the elections because the PA fails to fight terror.

Among those who indicated that they plan to vote for Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Kadima Party, 54% oppose and 37% support carrying out a significant unilateral withdrawal under those circumstances.

And the public sees retreat as a defining issue.

A follow up question found that of those who oppose unilateral withdrawal under those circumstances, 75% responded that they would not vote for a party that would support such a move.

Hammer home the message that a vote for Sharon is a vote for retreat and there is nothing he can say that will convince voters that this isn't the case.

Ironically, the very thing that appeals to Israelis: that he does what he wants, when he wants to, and could give a damn what anyone else says or what he himself may have said before -- would then be his Achilles heel.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |