Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Politics > Amona

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Dr. Aaron Lerner is co-founder of IMRA, Independent Media Review and Analysis, an Israel-based news organization which provides an extensive digest of media, polls and significant interviews and events relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
imra@netvision.net.il
Previous views
Will giving terrorists day-jobs as cops fulfill the Roadmap?
Will Olmert's move against settlers quash the retreat?
Bush's support for Sharon was mostly rhetoric
Post-Sharon Elections: Program Trumps (lack of) Personality
Former Shin Bet Chief squanders his integrity
Bibi's Choice: Defining the Likud democratically or dishonestly
Palestinian conditional non-violence denies the basis of the deal
Framing elections as retreat referendum could defeat Sharon
Clear Choices for a Change
After the "Peretz Earthquake"
Does it honor Rabin to distort his message?
Operation of passage points: not a question of "if" but "how"
Bush proves soft on Palestinian security compliance
Compensation for administrative detention: a small step forward
Rice soft on Hamas and disarming Palestinian terrorists
What did the Likud Central Committee vote mean?
Difference between Sharon-Peres and Netanyahu or Landau is fundamental
Has Israeli deterrence become a farce?
The Landau Candidacy

Views: Police Riot in Israel
What really transpired in Amona: Witnesses and officials call for inquiry

 
Breaking bones for victory
By Dr. Aaron Lerner   February 3, 2006


There is no denying the logic behind the advice that acting prime minister Ehud Olmert's campaign advisors no doubt gave him to mark the formal opening of the Kadima Party's election campaign by breaking the bones of protesters at Amona.

After all, overnight polling certainly would have shown that many potential Kadima voters were disappointed with the outcome in the Hebron market affair -- with the Jews evacuating on their own volition as part of an understanding (confirmed by the IDF and denied by AG Mazuz) that other Jews can be expected to replace them in the buildings in a month or two.

Heavily covered bone breaking no-nonsense "law enforcement" at Amona more than makes up for Hebron. Accepting the Yesha Council's proposal that they themselves would either re-locate or demolish the buildings within two weeks would have meant much more than a lost photo-op: it could have meant a drop of several percentage points in the polls for Kadima.

And to make matters worse for the Kadima campaign team, accepting the Yesha Council's proposal would have given the Yesha Council more credibility in the eyes of the protesters - thus increasing the possibility that they would be also able to successfully broker other evacuations - thus denying the Kadima campaign team the bone breaking law enforcement imagery they sought not only at Amona but at the other locations slated for action before the
elections.

The numbers definitely favored confrontation over peaceful resolution.

But with Kadima enjoying a huge lead in the polls was it really necessary for Mr. Olmert to put his campaign's interests ahead of those of the nation?

Is it really so critical that Kadima polls 43 seats instead of 39?

Perhaps Mr. Olmert's campaign advisors can't be faulted for wanting to maximize Kadima's victory at the polls at any cost, but that doesn't excuse Ehud Olmert for accepting their advice.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |