Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Diplomacy > "Convergence" plan

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Dr. Aaron Lerner is co-founder of IMRA, Independent Media Review and Analysis, an Israel-based news organization which provides an extensive digest of media, polls and significant interviews and events relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
imra@netvision.net.il
Previous views
Does Amir Peretz want to work on his C.V. or for his People?
Seven Questions for the Olmert Administration
Thinking through retreat
Worth making the effort to vote
Olmert's reality gap
Israel's window of opportunity to respond to the Hamas victory is closing
Hamas' rise offers Israel a chance to correct past policy mistakes
Breaking bones for victory
Will giving terrorists day-jobs as cops fulfill the Roadmap?
Will Olmert's move against settlers quash the retreat?
Bush's support for Sharon was mostly rhetoric
Post-Sharon Elections: Program Trumps (lack of) Personality
Former Shin Bet Chief squanders his integrity
Bibi's Choice: Defining the Likud democratically or dishonestly
Palestinian conditional non-violence denies the basis of the deal
Framing elections as retreat referendum could defeat Sharon
Clear Choices for a Change
After the "Peretz Earthquake"
Does it honor Rabin to distort his message?

Views: Olmert's Unilateralism Undermines Unity

 
Olmert's Retreat: Hardly Pragmatism Over Ideology
By Dr. Aaron Lerner   April 13, 2006


It has been an ongoing theme for retreat supporters to term their policy preference putting "pragmatism" over "ideology".

One can readily argue that the opposite is the case.

Is the implementation of a retreat that can be expected to leave the area under the control of a sovereign Hamas terror state out of a desire to immediately end the "occupation" at all costs so that at some future point in time Israel will not find itself forced to allow the Palestinians in the West Bank to vote in the Knesset (the "demographic threat") "pragmatism" or the expression of an extreme "ideology"?

Is the belief that if Israel unilaterally retreats to a line that this line will enjoy international recognition as a final border "pragmatism" or the wishful self-deception of an extreme "ideology"?

Is it "pragmatic" for Israel to essentially announce to the enemy that the more costly they make it for Israel to defend a given location that greater the odds Israel will retreat from it?

By the same token, is it "extremist" to oppose Mr. Olmert's retreat "idea" (the shallowness of the thinking that has gone into it so far is such that describing it as a "plan" might be deceptive) or instead "responsible"?

The use of this labeling is nothing new.

Looking back at the disastrous results, was Oslo "pragmatism" or "folly"?

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |