Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Diplomacy > "Convergence" plan

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Ryan Jones is a Gentile believer from the United States who has lived and worked in Israel for the past six years. He is the News Editor of Jerusalem Newswire.
ryan@zionist.com
Previous views
Glossing over rebellion
What if the Jews acted like Arabs?
Playing into terror's hands
How to foment civil war
Why another photo-op?
Where are the peace partners?
Continuing story, to be continued
Letting terrorism win
So what good is the Palestinian Authority, anyway?
The crux of the conflict
Why the hudna has already failed
Hamas cease-fire will bring increased death
There is a double standard - why?
Taking Israel's medicine
Palestinian Muslim religious intolerance
The definition of a hero
Indoctrination of death
A Muslim misses mass
When lawmakers are lawbreakers

Views: Security, not settlers or settlements, is the main issue
Views: Olmert: Take it One Year at a Time
Views: Olmert's Retreat: Hardly Pragmatism Over Ideology
Views: Olmert's Unilateralism Undermines Unity

 
Olmert's convergence is an existential threat
By Ryan Jones   April 27, 2006


Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's claim to have a clear mandate from the people to implement his "convergence" plan is very debatable.

But let's say for the sake of argument that his intention to surrender almost all of Israel's biblical heartland does enjoy majority support.

Does that necessarily make it a good idea?

There is not one shred of evidence suggesting that after Israel withdraws from over 90 percent of Judea and Samaria, the world will not continue to back Arab demands to surrender the rest, including the eastern half of Jerusalem.

In fact, recent comments from Washington, from where Olmert is hoping to gain recognition for Israel's new borders, suggest the exact opposite.

You see, while the American people in general may be Israel's unconditional friend, the powers that be in Washington will not risk further ruffling Europe's or the Arab world's feathers in order to back what its allies in Jerusalem say is best for the Jewish state.

Washington will, however, support the division of this land. Not because Olmert says such a move is necessary, but because Europe and the Arabs demand it.

And that is where US government support for Olmert's policies will stop -- where they cease to coincide with the demands of Israel's enemies.

It could not be any more plain that the end result of Olmert's "convergence" will be that Israel divests itself of its most valuable bargaining chips before final status negotiations even begin.

And when the day comes -- 5, 10, 15 years from now -- when the world forces Israel to again sit down with the "Palestinians" and hammer out a final peace deal, what will Israel have left with which to negotiate? Pretty much nothing, and the Arabs have consistently proven they will not offer "peace" in return for nothing.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |