Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
"Convergence" plan

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Dr. Aaron Lerner is co-founder of IMRA, Independent Media Review and Analysis, an Israel-based news organization which provides an extensive digest of media, polls and significant interviews and events relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
imra@netvision.net.il
Previous views
Security, not settlers or settlements, is the main issue
Olmert's Retreat: Hardly Pragmatism Over Ideology
Does Amir Peretz want to work on his C.V. or for his People?
Seven Questions for the Olmert Administration
Thinking through retreat
Worth making the effort to vote
Olmert's reality gap
Israel's window of opportunity to respond to the Hamas victory is closing
Hamas' rise offers Israel a chance to correct past policy mistakes
Breaking bones for victory
Will giving terrorists day-jobs as cops fulfill the Roadmap?
Will Olmert's move against settlers quash the retreat?
Bush's support for Sharon was mostly rhetoric
Post-Sharon Elections: Program Trumps (lack of) Personality
Former Shin Bet Chief squanders his integrity
Bibi's Choice: Defining the Likud democratically or dishonestly
Palestinian conditional non-violence denies the basis of the deal
Framing elections as retreat referendum could defeat Sharon
Clear Choices for a Change

Views: Olmert's convergence is an existential threat
Views: Security, not settlers or settlements, is the main issue
Views: Olmert: Take it One Year at a Time
Views: Olmert's Retreat: Hardly Pragmatism Over Ideology
Views: Olmert's Unilateralism Undermines Unity

 
No Jordan Option
By Dr. Aaron Lerner   April 28, 2006


Before the retreat from the Gaza Strip Ehud Olmert was proudly clueless as to who or what would fill the void.

But today, in the aftermath of the rise of Hamas to power, the simplistic "RFTH" (run for the hills) approach is wearing thin.

In fact, some of the people in Prime Minister Olmert's party think that the new withdrawal plan from most of the West Bank would actually leave the IDF in place and only bulldoze the Jewish communities on the wrong side of the separation fence.

Some now are suggesting that the void created by an Israeli retreat be filled by Jordan.

After all, what could be easier for Israel to do than to dump the problem of the security control of the West Bank on "moderate" Jordan?

But is it really such a simple and robust solution?

Bringing Jordan back into the West Bank means having a sovereign entity stretching from the border of Iraq to the backyard of Kfar Sava.

And given the virtual impossibility to predict the future viability and/or orientation of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, putting the West Bank under Jordanian sovereignty ultimately means that Allah-knows-what-regime would have the sovereign right to move divisions of tanks, position heavy artillery pieces, mobile anti-aircraft equipment etc. within earshot of my home in Raanana and all of this without Israel being able to do much more than go on alert.

As options go, the "Jordan option" isn't much different from "surrender and appeasement."

RFTH just means setting the stage for further retreats and a debilitating ongoing war of attrition.

The "Jordan option" - if Jordan agreed - would mean a temporary respite with a very real chance of ultimately facing an even more dangerous situation.

If it were only so simple.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |