Israel's daily newsmagazine
   Israel's daily newsmagazine
| home |   security |   politics |   diplomacy |   anti-semitism |   culture |   travel |   views | today's weblog  
 
Politics > "Convergence" plan

   



 
Sign up for free!

E-mail
 
         
       
         










Dr. Aaron Lerner is co-founder of IMRA, Independent Media Review and Analysis, an Israel-based news organization which provides an extensive digest of media, polls and significant interviews and events relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
imra@netvision.net.il
Previous views
Is "peace for a moment" moral?
Eulogy for a man of deeds
Regional instability: it's not about Israel
No Jordan Option
Security, not settlers or settlements, is the main issue
Olmert's Retreat: Hardly Pragmatism Over Ideology
Does Amir Peretz want to work on his C.V. or for his People?
Seven Questions for the Olmert Administration
Thinking through retreat
Worth making the effort to vote
Olmert's reality gap
Israel's window of opportunity to respond to the Hamas victory is closing
Hamas' rise offers Israel a chance to correct past policy mistakes
Breaking bones for victory
Will giving terrorists day-jobs as cops fulfill the Roadmap?
Will Olmert's move against settlers quash the retreat?
Bush's support for Sharon was mostly rhetoric
Post-Sharon Elections: Program Trumps (lack of) Personality
Former Shin Bet Chief squanders his integrity

Former COS Ya'alon: We need Churchills, not Chamberlains.
Views: "Consolidation": Olmert, you owe me!
Views: No Jordan Option
Views: Olmert's convergence is an existential threat
Views: Security, not settlers or settlements, is the main issue
Views: Olmert: Take it One Year at a Time
Views: Olmert's Retreat: Hardly Pragmatism Over Ideology
Views: Olmert's Unilateralism Undermines Unity

 
Retreat proponents jeopardize future talks
By Dr. Aaron Lerner   June 1, 2006


While claims by retreat proponents that Israeli withdrawals only serve to benefit the Jewish State may serve to help them in the domestic debate, their arguments could very well seriously handicap future Palestinian leaders who might be interested in striking a workable bargain.

Any future workable deal will, by its nature, require Palestinian compromise on such issues as the right of return of refugees to within Israel's borders, force/weapons limits inside the Palestinian entity and airspace control, just to name a few.

If the time is ever reached that Israel finds itself dealing with a serious Palestinian leadership that delivers on its obligations, those Palestinian leaders are going to have to convince their constituents that Palestinian concessions were matched by Israeli concessions in the give-and-take of the bargaining table.

The retreat from Gaza already took the Gaza "chips" off the table. Remarks by Olmert, Peres and others that additional retreats would be an Israeli gain rather than a sacrifice do not go unnoticed by the Palestinian street.

They could readily set the stage for a future stalemate as Palestinian negotiators, interested as much in their own survival as in making a deal, find the Palestinian public unimpressed by Israeli territorial concessions even if they are truly bare-bones Israeli red lines.

Rather than promote the chances for peace, these retreat advocate are jeopardizing the chances of ever negotiating a workable deal.

Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


 Talk Back! Respond to this view



Click on the blue headline to read a Talkback comment and respond to it. Click on the icon to send a private email to the talkback writer. The icon appears only if the writer has decided to be contacted. If no popup window appears, please make sure your popup blocker allows israelinsider.com.

 
  | about |   partners |   sponsor |   donate |   news |   subscribe |   contact |